“Nasty fujoshis are fetishizing mlm” antis are an inevitable result of “kink critical”/”kinks are nasty” antis.
Antis think kinks are bad, right? And what’s a kink? Any “abnormal” or “unusual” sex practice. Anyone who opposes kinks as a category inherently accepts that socionormative rules for sexuality are good.
Which means that, ultimately, all queer sex is bad under a “kink critical” paradigm. That’s why any BL manga or slashfic is “fetishizing mlm” or “pedophilia.” That’s why any f/f porn is “just made for perverted straight men.” That’s why any trans porn is “disgusting transphobic fetishization.” These people have to keep up a veneer of progressivism to get anyone to agree with them, but underneath it, like the conservatives and Christians they spring from, like the norms they’ve accepted, they see any kind of queer sexuality as deviant and wrong. They’ll give lip service to the idea of the most vanilla possible queer sex–loaded down with so many conditions and qualifiers that almost no one actually would be having that type of sex–but really, whether or not they consciously realize it, in the end they want all non-straight, non-het, non-cis, non-white sexuality erased from the collective imagination. That’s what you get if you follow “kink critical logic” to its conclusion. Baby-making only, and that, grudgingly tolerated. Wouldn’t want to fetishize fetuses or the womb-vessels around them, after all.
KayjsCage 
You must be logged in to post a comment.